There is a real human behind co2h2o.cloud. Use the right channel below for the fastest response. We read every message but reserve the right not to respond to vendor pitches, low-effort link-exchange requests, or messages whose subject line we cannot parse.
If you spot a factual error on the site — a wrong number, a misread S-1 disclosure, a stale valuation comp, a broken citation — send it to[email protected]. Include the URL of the page, a screenshot or quote of the specific claim, and the source you believe is correct. We will respond within 48 hours and either correct the page (with a dated correction note at the bottom) or explain why we believe the original is accurate.
We treat corrections as the most important inbound the site receives. Source pointers are welcome with or without an opinion attached.
We accept original analysis from outside contributors when the analysis advances the dependency-graph thesis or adds a load-bearing dataset we do not have. Send pitches to[email protected]. We do not pay for guest analysis at this time but we do credit authors prominently.
We do not accept syndicated content, press releases, AI-written drafts without human author attribution, or pieces with embedded affiliate or sponsorship arrangements that have not been disclosed up front.
If you operate a data source we could integrate (FCC filings parser, satellite TLE feed, government contracts dashboard, financial data API), or if you operate a publication that would be a good distribution partner, write to[email protected] with “Partnership” in the subject line.
For licensing of the dependency-graph dataset under terms beyond non-commercial attribution, email[email protected].
Journalists covering the SPCX IPO, the Musk-empire cap-table consolidation, or the broader question of which infrastructure stacks are unsubstitutable should email[email protected] with “Press” in the subject. We are happy to provide background, source citations, or on-the-record commentary.
We do not embargo data. Anything on the site is publishable as long as it is attributed.
Privacy requests under GDPR, CCPA, or other applicable law:[email protected]. See Privacy Policy for what we hold and how to request access, correction, or deletion.
Legal notices, including DMCA takedown requests and trademark complaints:[email protected]. DMCA notices must include the elements required by 17 U.S.C. §512(c)(3). We respond to valid notices within ten business days.
Everything else:[email protected]. We are a small team — please be patient with response time on non-urgent inbound. Inbound about active corrections, time-sensitive press, or legal notices always jumps the queue.
We do not have a phone number, a contact form, or a social-media DM channel. Email is the only supported way to reach us.
Every financial figure on this site is traced to a primary document — almost always the SpaceX Form S-1 / S-1A on SEC EDGAR (CIK 0001181412) — and every page carries a linked Sources block so you can check our work. Where a number comes from secondary reporting (Reuters, Bloomberg, CNBC, trade press) rather than the filing itself, we say so on the page and label it “reported” rather than presenting it as confirmed. Projections, targets, and analyst forecasts are flagged as such, not laundered into facts. This is the editorial standard the whole site is built on, and it is why the contact channels above exist: if you find a figure that is wrong, stale, or missing its provenance, the corrections channel is the fastest way to get it fixed.
On timing: corrections to a published figure are reviewed the same day and patched on the live site once verified, with a dated note where the change is material. Editorial pitches and partnership inquiries typically get a first reply within a few business days; press on a live news cycle is prioritized and usually answered same-day. We are a small, independent team operating under the n2ai.io masthead, and we would rather answer a hard question slowly and correctly than quickly and wrong. Nothing on this site is financial advice — it is structural analysis of the SpaceX IPO and the dependency graph beneath it, published so you can reach your own conclusions.